Research · 10 October 2026

The landscape, one value at a time.

82 projects, products, protocols and ideas in seven clusters. Each has a dossier: what it is, the problem underneath, its bet, and what fictty should take from it. The radar shows how close each one sits to fictty, the map compares any two scores, and the board reads the clusters and their debates.

Relation to fictty (rings, inside out)

1adopt
Speak it natively, as an input fictty accepts. (1)
2build-on
A dependency fictty runs on or lifts code from. (2)
3complement
Works beside fictty. Integrate, report status, ship recipes. (18)
4compete
Does part of fictty's job for some of its users. Win on the claims or concede. (5)
5inspire
Borrow the idea, not the code. (38)
6watch
Not in the way today; could move toward fictty. (18)

Scores

code vs data
0 the UI is code, 10 it is pure data
ephemerality
0 a durable app, 10 made for one question and thrown away
read-back
0 the agent can't see what's drawn, 10 exact state read back
live data
0 frozen when written, 10 bound to live sources that skip the model
learning
0 no bearing on understanding, 10 built to teach
threat
0 to 5: how much of fictty's job it could take
adopt fit
0 to 5: how well fictty could use it directly

fictty, scored the same way

code vs data9
ephemerality7
read-back9
live data9
learning3

Scored from the scope, as built today. Learning is low because nothing in fictty teaches yet; that's a direction, not a feature. Threat and fit don't apply to fictty itself.

82 entries
Filters
surface
layer
relation
evidence